User loginLogin Help LinksNew Members Register Here
|
Financial & LegalRetirement Could be a W(H)ealth HazardSubmitted by rlewis on 17 July, 2008 - 15:06.
This contribution from Paul McKeon [info@mylifechange.com.au ] Many people in the retirement and counseling industries would confirm that many long term marriages hit trouble and can break up when the husband retires from full time work. Wives complain of husbands hanging round all day, requiring high maintenance and pressuring them to change their routines. For most couples, this is the first time they have been together 24/7 in their entire marriage & that can be a real shock. Boredom and a lack of purpose can make many men depressed and lead to ill health, weight gain and excessive drinking. “During the first 2 years of retirement, when men especially are trying to cope with major changes in their lifestyles, there is an increased danger of heart problems. Finally if couples find that they are seriously unhappy and decide to divorce, the nest egg they have been saving is suddenly cut in half. Not a pretty picture!” Paul said that unfortunately, the Financial Planning Industry generally doesn’t alert people to these dangers, so when most couples discover that retirement is not necessarily one long holiday, they struggle to find help.
The underlying message is that a person’s 50s and 60s are a great time of their life when they have the time, wisdom and hopefully money to get out and enjoy the adventures and experiences that are available to them. ( categories: Financial & Legal News )
Reverse Mortgages and Young SeniorsSubmitted by rlewis on 13 May, 2008 - 09:08.
Media release Warning for younger seniors embracing reverse mortgage With the under-70 age bracket the fastest growing sector in the reverse mortgage market, industry expert Tim Stoyles is concerned younger seniors are compromising the equity in their home too early. “The average age of seniors drawing down a reverse mortgage has dropped from 74 to 72, and the fastest growing sector is the under 70’s. $55,000 – 60,000 is the average loan amount. What concerns me is that at 65 you have conservatively 20 years life expectancy, and this figure continues to increase,” said Mr Stoyles, director of reverse mortgage consultancy Sydney Wyde Investments and Mortgage Management. With reverse mortgage rates around double digits for the first time this decade and the growth area of new applications for this product being that under 70’s age group, potential reverse mortgage applicants need to be careful about how they draw down the loan, he added. “Compound interest over this period can have a dramatic effect on their home equity, especially when you need this equity for an accommodation bond or aged care costs in future years. If a 65 year old takes out the average mortgage of $60,000 as a lump sum compared to the same amount as an income stream of $1,000 a month for 5 years, the difference in their mortgage balance in 20 years is approximately $90,000.” “The extra $90,000 at that stage in your life could be the difference in being able to obtain the care you require, at a time when you need it the most.” Mr Stoyles said brokers and other reverse mortgage lenders should employ the same rationale as SWIMM, ensuring that the focus of using this product is addressing the applicant’s immediate needs only, whilst trying to plan for future requirements. “You have to remember 20 years life expectancy at age 65 today is just the average, you could have a good 30 years left under your belt so we all need to plan carefully,” Mr Stoyles said. “It is also important to note that there is nothing stopping you from going back to the Lender for another income stream after the initial 5 years is up, provided the equity in your home is sufficient based on the aged base lending criteria of the Lender. “With careful planning you could realistically set up a 20 year income stream as the property value keeps pace with the loan balance, provided we start with a smaller monthly annuity. Again, this all depends on your needs and circumstances which should be fully investigated for you.” For media enquiries, please call Erik Bigalk or Glen Scott at Use My Mind on (02) 6681 3844 or 0421 441 366 erik@usemymind.com.au ( categories: Financial & Legal News )
You should think about your insuranceSubmitted by rlewis on 31 January, 2008 - 09:32.
Avoid being a hard luck insurance story
Monday, January 21, 2008 Lynelle Johnson RECENT FLOODS have once again brought out problems with household insurance and with the bushfire season not yet over we could well be hearing more tales of distress. But there are some simple things you can do to avoid insurance trouble. The Insurance Council of Australia says that 23% of houses in Australia have no insurance. It would be nice to think that those households have keenly calculated the risks and made a clear decision to self-insure. But if everything you own gets wiped out by a disaster, will a few years of saved premiums really seem worth it? Beyond the huge swathe of uninsurance lies a vast tract of underinsurance. It's very easy to take out a policy – and keep making repayments on it – while year after year you keep bringing more things into the house. Just the passage of time and normal living can see you ending up chronically under-insured. So if you do want to sleep a little easier at night, here's are some tips for keeping your policy current:
It's also very important to check your policy for the details of which items, and at what values, possessions need to be specifically registered with your insurance company. When insuring your house you also need to be aware of the difference between storm damage (water coming down) and flood damage (water coming up). Most home insurance policies don't cover flooding according to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). It can also be tricky to find out if you even need separate flood cover, as there's no central register of flood prone areas. ASIC say you need to become a detective and check out the following sources:
If you do live in an at-risk area cheaper cover can be obtained for 'flash flooding' where the water rises within twenty four hours of the rainfall that caused it. But ASIC strongly advises that you should never buy flood insurance over the phone. You need to get a copy of the policy and make sure you understand what's in it before paying for it. They also advise that you ask any questions about the policy in writing. If you later have a dispute you'll need their answers on company letterhead. Insurance is a competitive market so shop around and compare the policies and the prices. If things do go wrong you can take a complaint to the Insurance Ombudsman Service (IOS), but only if your insurer participates, so you might want to check that out in advance too. Where to find out more The Insurance Council has information on keeping insurance up to date on its website at www.insurancecouncil.com.au You can check for participating members of the Insurance Ombudsman Service on their website: www.insuranceombudsman.com.au NSW Legal Aid has produced a booklet on dealing with insurance companies about flood cover available at www.legalaid.nsw.gov.au Choice sell a test for checking your insurance from their website www.choice.com.au ( categories: Financial & Legal News )
Is “me too” really enough?Submitted by gmckenzie on 13 November, 2007 - 14:40.
With less than two weeks until election day, it’s time to see what is really being proposed for the benefit of seniors. Commentators are stating that the difference of voting intentions between older and younger voters has never been greater. Will seniors continue to support the government in large numbers as it has in previous elections? Due to the huge tax surpluses that the government is enjoying because of the mineral boom, there is a lot of money that both sides are throwing around in election promises. Just what is being offered for seniors? This is a brief summary of what is on offer from both sides:
So there we have it. There is plenty of mirroring between the policies from both sides, so it is up to us within the fortnight to decide which party is to get our vote and decide who will govern the country. ( categories: Financial & Legal News )
As good as it gets?Submitted by gmckenzie on 30 October, 2007 - 10:59.
We have lived through two momentous dates for seniors – 1st July 2007 and 20th September 2007, and survived! The importance of the first date is that once you are sixty and retired, all income earned through your superannuation is tax free. This applies whether you take your income as a complying pension or a lump sum. As it is very easy to get money in a tax free form once you are over sixty, a major strategy for all people approaching retirement will be to get as many assets into super as possible. I know of no other country in the world that is as generous with its taxation treatment of superannuation once you are over sixty as Australia. Due to huge tax royalties being earned by the government as a result of an annual boom, the government is attempting to redistribute this largesse across the wider community. No tax on super is one example of this. The second date is important as it has marked changes in the tests that apply in obtaining the aged pension. The assets test upper limit has been made far more generous. This means that many seniors getting a part pension will receive either a full or a much larger part pension. Centrelink will adjust this entitlement automatically. Many seniors who have previously had too many assets to claim a pension will now be able to do so. However, if you have not previously qualified for at least a part pension but believe that you now will, you must register with Centrelink. So far so good. If you have been able to save during your working life, the income you receive in your retirement years will be more generous but if you have not been able to save much in your working life, retirement will mean years of belt tightening as the basic pension has not been adjusted by more that the CPI. A federal election has been called. It will be interesting to see what the political parties offer seniors. The government has made an opening play for the seniors vote but we are yet to hear what the opposition will offer. It is a good time for all seniors to be lobbying their current and would-be federal members of parliament for a fair go for seniors. ( categories: Financial & Legal News )
Reading Company ReportsSubmitted by rlewis on 24 September, 2007 - 14:33.
( categories: Financial & Legal News )
Deeming AccountsSubmitted by rlewis on 30 August, 2007 - 11:32.
This important article is taken from Scott Francis's Eureka Report
PORTFOLIO POINT: Pensioners would be better off having money in a cash account than in one of the banks' deeming accounts, which are geared to minimum levels. Higher interest rates have triggered a fresh round of negative headlines. Loans are more expensive for businesses and home buyers, and mortgage repayments are soaking up more household income, leaving less for consumer spending. There is one group of people who will be quietly happy with an interest rate rise, however: those retirees who are living, in part, on the interest earned from their cash account. As we move towards an era of higher rates, the chase for higher-yielding securities will increase across the board. Retirees with ample funds in cash accounts - especially traditional cash management trusts or online accounts - are now enjoying 'risk-free' rates of at least 5.5% and sometimes up to 6%. Unless, that is, they have fallen for the great 'deeming account' con. What is deeming? Deeming is a calculation that is used to generate an estimate of income earned on the financial assets of a person, and is used in the calculation of the age pension assets test. For example, let us consider a single age pensioner with $100,000 in a bank account. The deeming rules say that the first $39,400 is deemed to earn 3.5% and the remainder 5.5%. Therefore, for income test purposes, the single age pensioner would be deemed to have earned $4106. Here is the important part. It does not actually matter if that person earns more than the $4106. For the income test purposes, they are only deemed to earn $4106. In fact, an article on the website of the Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, says: "Deeming also encourages people to consider earning better returns on their investments. Prior to the introduction of deeming, many income support recipients elected to receive little or no income from their savings." The whole point of deeming is that it provides a simple assessment of income, and then encourages people to seek higher investment returns without having to worry about being penalised under the Centrelink income test. How is this being abused? Let's have a look at a few accounts. The Commonwealth Bank has a 'Pensioner Security Account', which pays interest of 3.5% on balances between $2000 and $39,400. The interest above $39,400 is 5.5%. The National Australia Bank has a 'NAB Retirement Account'. It also pays interest of 3.5% on balances between $2000 and $39,400. The interest above $39,400 is 5.5%. The NAB website boasts that: "The NAB Retirement Account is specially designed to address the Government's pension income assessment and deeming rules." ANZ has two deeming accounts on offer, both with exactly the same interest rate structure as the Commonwealth and NAB accounts. Westpac has a deeming account advertised as being 'designed to comply with legislated deeming rules'. Westpac says: "We use these deemed interest rates as a guide for setting the interest rates on our Deeming Account'' What is the deception? The deception is this. The deeming rules are not meant to limit what a pensioner earns from their financial assets. In fact, the opposite is true. The deeming rate is meant to be a simple calculation of income that can be used for the Centrelink income test. From there, it does not matter if the pensioner actually earns more than this rate of income; in fact, the Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs actually hopes that the deeming rules encourage people to then seek a higher rate of return. Instead, the banks align their interest rates and interest rate tiers exactly with the deeming rules. It is difficult to think that this is done for any reason other than to misrepresent allowable earning rates to pensioners. After all, the chances that the four banks we looked at co-incidentally mirrored both the deeming interest rates and the deeming threshold changes are so small as to be not worth considering. Even some of the advertising on deeming accounts is disingenuous, with statements such as: "Designed to comply with legislated deeming rules" and "specially designed to address the Government's pension income assessment and deeming rules". What is the cost of this deception? Let's consider a pensioner with $50,000 in a cash account. In a deeming account earning no interest on the first $2000, 3.5% on the balance up to $39,400 and 5.5% on the rest, a pensioner will earn $1892 worth of interest. If this same pensioner invested the $50,000 into an online bank account paying interest of 6% a year - and there are plenty of these available - they would earn $3000 a year, an extra $1108. It does not sound like a huge amount of money, but an extra $21.30 a week buys more than the occasional coffee. What if interest rates rise? With the most recent rise in interest rates, pensioners should have picked up an extra 0.25% in interest from a good cash account, and there is talk of another interest rate rise later this year. However, those pensioners who have their money parked in a deeming account run the risk of missing both of these potential increases in income entirely.
( categories: Financial & Legal News )
|
Your SIG Manager Financial & Legal is Grant MackenzieGoogle Adsense |